Weight-Bearing CT: What It Shows That an X-Ray Can’t

Home / Weight-Bearing CT: What It Shows That an X-Ray Can’t

 

Expert Patient Guide · Foot & Ankle Surgeon · London

Weight-Bearing CT: What It Shows That an X-Ray Can’t

A clear, evidence-based guide to weight-bearing CT scanning of the foot and ankle — written by Mr Matthew Welck, Consultant Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Surgeon at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH) and Honorary Associate Clinical Professor at UCL.

At a Glance

  • It is a CT scan taken while you stand on your foot — the one position in which foot problems tend to hide.
  • The radiation dose is very low: an average of 0.04 mSv for cone-beam CT against 0.13 mSv for a normal CT — about a third as much, roughly the same as a few days of natural background radiation.
  • It is quick: the scan itself takes around 4.5 minutes on average, less than the 6.6 minutes needed for plain X-rays.
  • It shows things standing X-rays cannot — a review of 78 studies found that 56 reported measurements that could not be made on weight-bearing X-rays at all.
  • It changes decisions, not just pictures: in ankle arthritis following injury, 3D scans found a second, compensating deformity below the ankle in 46% of patients.
  • It is not needed for most problems — a simple sprain, an ordinary bunion or common heel pain do not usually need it.

01

The Problem With Lying Down

Almost everything that goes wrong with feet goes wrong when you put weight on them. An arch drops when you stand on it. A heel drifts outwards when it takes your body weight. A bunion twists as the foot pushes off. Loose ligaments only show themselves when something is pulling on them.

Ordinary scans miss this in two different ways.

A normal CT gives excellent 3D detail — but it is taken lying down, with no weight through the foot. A deformity that is obvious when you stand can look almost normal on the couch.

Standing X-rays do at least capture your weight going through the foot, but they squash a 3D shape into a flat picture. Bones overlap each other. The measurements depend on exactly how the foot was placed and where the X-ray tube was pointing, so two X-rays of the same foot can give different numbers.

Weight-bearing CT was made to give both at once: 3D detail, taken while you stand.

02

What Actually Happens

You walk into a room with a scanner that has a low, open ring at floor level:

  • You step inside and stand normally, usually with both feet in, holding a support bar to steady yourself
  • The ring turns around your feet and lower legs — you stand still for less than a minute
  • You step out

Nothing closes around your head or body. There is no tunnel, no injection, and no need to lie down. People who find MRI scans claustrophobic usually have no trouble with this one.

The scan takes minutes rather than the half-hour an MRI needs. In one study, the whole imaging session was quicker for cone-beam CT than for plain X-rays.

03

Radiation: The Honest Numbers

This is the question patients ask most often, so it is worth answering properly.

Cone-beam CT uses less radiation than a normal CT because it scans only a small part of the body, and the feet contain no organs that are sensitive to radiation. A study in the same patients found an average dose of 0.04 mSv for cone-beam CT of the limbs, against 0.13 mSv for a normal CT.

For context: natural background radiation in the UK is about 2.7 mSv a year — so 0.04 mSv is roughly what you get from a few days of ordinary life. A review of radiation doses in non-dental cone-beam CT confirmed that scanning arms and legs is a low-dose test, while noting that the exact figures depend on the machine and its settings.

That is reassuring, but the dose is not zero, so the scan should be requested for a clear reason rather than as a routine.

04

What It Shows That a Standing X-Ray Cannot

A review of 78 studies of weight-bearing CT found that 56 of them reported findings that could not be obtained from standing X-rays. Some of the most useful examples:

  • The foot slipping sideways under the ankle bone (peritalar subluxation). In a collapsing flat foot, the whole foot rotates out from under the talus — and this cannot be measured reliably on a flat picture.
  • The true position of the heel when you stand, measured in 3D rather than guessed from a single view.
  • Twisting of the first toe bone in a bunion. A bunion is a 3D deformity, and the twisting part of it cannot be seen on ordinary X-rays. It is linked to bunions coming back after surgery.
  • Small amounts of looseness between the two shin bones. After a high ankle sprain, a small gap opening up between the tibia and fibula can be missed. Because weight-bearing CT can scan both ankles at the same time, the uninjured side can be used for comparison — in people with no injury the difference between sides is usually under about 9%, and a difference above roughly 19% suggests something is wrong.
  • Small amounts of looseness in the middle of the foot (a Lisfranc injury) when you stand on it, to see whether the midfoot has become unstable after an injury.
  • Bone rubbing on bone — whether the heel bone is actually touching the fibula in a collapsing foot, which shows up under weight and disappears lying down.
  • How much room is left in a joint when you stand on it, showing where a joint is genuinely worn down under load, rather than where it only looks worn on a flat picture.
  • A clear picture of the anatomy in complicated 3D deformities.

05

Why This Changes Decisions

The point is not better pictures. It is different answers.

In a study of 72 patients with severe ankle arthritis following an injury, automatic 3D measurements were compared with the usual measurements taken from standing X-rays. The 3D measurements were more reliable — and 46% of patients had a second deformity below the ankle that was making up for a deformity above it.

Why it matters: if the ankle is corrected without noticing the deformity below it, the operation can be done well and still not give the result you hoped for. It is one of the reasons foot and ankle surgery sometimes disappoints.

In the same way, in bunion surgery, correcting the twist as well as the sideways angle has been linked to better function and fewer bunions coming back — and that twist is measured on a weight-bearing CT.

06

When It Is Genuinely Useful

Weight-bearing CT is not needed for every foot or ankle problem. It earns its place in deformity, alignment problems, small amounts of looseness in a joint, and complex or repeat surgery.

Likely to Be Helpful

  • Flat foot, or a foot that is slowly collapsing, where flexibility and how far it has slipped under the ankle decide the operation
  • A very high-arched (cavus) foot
  • Ankle arthritis being assessed for a replacement or a fusion, where the alignment above and below the ankle changes the plan
  • Bunion assessment where twisting, or a bunion coming back, is a concern
  • Possible small amounts of looseness in the ankle after a high ankle sprain
  • Arthritis in the middle of the foot, and small Lisfranc injuries
  • Ongoing pain after previous surgery, where the alignment needs to be checked properly
  • Planning complex or repeat reconstruction, including custom-made surgical guides

Usually Not Needed

  • A simple ankle sprain
  • Ordinary plantar fasciitis (heel pain)
  • A standard bunion with a clear plan already made from plain X-rays
  • Anything mainly involving soft tissue — a torn tendon, damaged cartilage or a nerve problem. MRI is still the right test for those, and weight-bearing CT does not replace it

07

An Honest Note on the Evidence

Weight-bearing CT is genuinely useful, and it is only fair to be clear about what has and has not been proven.

The review of 78 studies rated the quality of those studies as moderate — an average score of 9.8 out of 24. A wider review of 129 studies published between 2013 and 2023 showed fast-growing interest, mostly in collapsing flat foot and bunions, but most of that research describes measurements and how repeatable they are, rather than proving that patients end up better off.

What we do know: weight-bearing CT measures foot and ankle alignment more accurately and more consistently than standing X-rays, and shows things those X-rays cannot. What we do not yet know: exactly which patients get a better result because of it. That research is still going on, including work from this unit.

So it is a better measuring tool, used when it is needed — not a scan everyone should have.

08

About Mr Matthew Welck

Mr Matthew Welck is a Consultant Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Surgeon at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, and Honorary Associate Clinical Professor at UCL. Using weight-bearing CT to assess 3D foot and ankle deformity is one of his research interests, and he uses it when planning complex reconstruction, repeat surgery and custom-made surgical guides. He sees patients across North and Central London.

09

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a weight-bearing CT hurt?

No. You stand still for less than a minute, with a support bar to steady yourself. There are no injections and nothing touches you.

How much radiation is involved?

Very little. Cone-beam CT of the limbs has been measured at about 0.04 mSv, compared with 0.13 mSv for a normal CT of the same area — roughly the same as a few days of natural background radiation. Doses vary with the machine and its settings.

Is it the same as a normal CT scan?

No. A normal CT is taken lying down, with no weight through the foot. A weight-bearing CT is taken while you stand, which is when most foot and ankle problems actually show up.

Is it better than an MRI?

They answer different questions. Weight-bearing CT shows where the bones sit and how the foot lines up when you stand on it. MRI shows soft tissue — tendons, ligaments, cartilage and the inside of the bone. Many complicated cases need both.

Can I have it if I am claustrophobic?

Almost always, yes. The scanner is an open ring at floor level, and nothing closes around your head or body.

Will I need one?

Only if it will change something. It is most useful for deformity, alignment problems, small amounts of looseness in a joint, and complex or repeat surgery. For most straightforward foot and ankle problems, standing X-rays are enough.

Can both feet be scanned at once?

Usually yes, and this is one of its advantages — the uninjured side gives a direct comparison, which is especially helpful for small ankle injuries after a high ankle sprain.

Is it available on the NHS?

It is only available in a few specialist centres at the moment, although this is growing. It is available at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital.

Does it replace X-rays?

No. Standing X-rays are still the first test, and they are better for some things, including checking for problems around metalwork. Weight-bearing CT is an extra test for certain problems.

10

Book a Consultation

Weight-bearing CT is a test, not a treatment — and any scan is only worth having if it changes what happens next. If you have a deformity, an alignment problem, or symptoms that plain X-rays have not explained, an assessment can work out whether a 3D scan would actually add anything.

To arrange a consultation with Mr Matthew Welck:

  • Telephone: 07547 395 270
  • Email/contact form: matthewwelck.com/contact
  • NHS referrals: via your GP to RNOH Stanmore
  • Private appointments: North and Central London

Urgent same-day appointments are offered where possible.

This article is for general information and patient education only. It is not a substitute for being assessed, diagnosed or treated by a qualified healthcare professional.

References

  1. Li J, Fang M, Van Oevelen A, Peiffer M, Audenaert E, Burssens A. Diagnostic applications and benefits of weightbearing CT in the foot and ankle: A systematic review of clinical studies. Foot Ankle Surg. 2024;30(1):7–20.
  2. Huang AJ, Chang CY, Thomas BJ, MacMahon PJ, Palmer WE. Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44(6):797–809.
  3. Nardi C, Salerno S, Molteni R, et al. Radiation dose in non-dental cone beam CT applications: a systematic review. Radiol Med. 2018;123(10):765–777.
  4. Kvarda P, Heisler L, Krähenbühl N, et al. 3D Assessment in Posttraumatic Ankle Osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(2):200–214.
  5. Bernasconi A, Dechir Y, Izzo A, et al. Trends in the Use of Weightbearing Computed Tomography. J Clin Med. 2024;13(18):5519.
  6. Bejarano-Pineda L, Ashkani-Esfahani S, Peiffer M, et al. Defining normative side-to-side differences in the distal tibiofibular joint of healthy individuals using weight-bearing CT 3D image analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(7):583–586.
  7. Lôbo CFT, Pires EA, Bordalo-Rodrigues M, de Cesar Netto C, Godoy-Santos AL. Imaging of progressive collapsing foot deformity with emphasis on the role of weightbearing cone beam CT. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51(6):1127–1141.

Study data above retrieved via PubMed.

Written by: Matthew Welck | Consultant Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Surgeon London — last updated 23 August 2026

CALL ME
+
Call me!